And since we're talking of Aphrodite, which is not only the goddess of beauty, and that no accident that bears the double title of Urania and Pandemic, I would like to bring to your attention a book that not only find beautiful, precisely, but also individual as the missing link, the demonstration that lacked a common philosophy that fought idea of \u200b\u200bsecularism.
I believe in secularism, in that cross-cultural value that identifies the cornerstones of morality beyond the customs, traditions, religions, common idea.
I believe that philosophy as a science of thought and value of research should be the ontological foundation of morality, that the state should be secular, that the crucifixes in school can be made or not made, ma senza mai dimenticare che la scuola ha una funzione educativa che deve prescindere da queste beghe di quartiere per l’accaparramento del territorio.
L’obiettivo delle religioni è fare proseliti e sinceramente noi invece abbiamo bisogno di un po’ di sana arte maieutica che riesca a tirare fuori dall’uomo qualcosa di buono, qualcosa che abbia a che fare con la sua essenza, con la sua identità.
Si può essere estremamente spirituali ed estremamente laici, anzi, credo che le due cose non collidano affatto.
La spiritualità, a differenza della religione, è una ricerca personale, che prescinde dai dogmi e come può coltiva il dubbio, not necessarily look for labels that is then recognized in a continual questioning that is independent of a thousand names of God.
And to get back to Aphrodite, which I mentioned at the beginning, she is remembered as a beautiful goddess of love.
This love of the tortured body, denied, denied, manipulated, sublimated.
not really know what there is left.
Ah yes, the modern love rebellion of the body without dignity.
's why I liked the book by Michel Onfray, "Theory of body love," published by Fazi Editore, because through all the nuances of philosophy has come to give new giocosità al corpo e al piacere, a renderlo dunque “laico”.
Ma vorrei riportare alcuni brani dello stesso Onfray:
“La prima tappa, critica, del mio percorso, implica una decostruzione dell’ideale ascetico: per fare ciò cercherò di farla finita con i principi della logica della rinuncia, che tradizionalmente mette in relazione desideri e mancanza, definisce la felicità come compiutezza e realizzazione di sé nell’altro, per l’altro e per mezzo dell’altro; eviterò di sottomettermi all’idea che la coppia fusionale rappresenti la formula ideale di questo ipotetico culmine ontologico; cesserò di contrapporre brutalmente anima and body, because this dualism, which has become a formidable weapon of war in the hands of the fans hate him, and organizes a legitimate moral moralizing articulated the spirit of positivity and negativity of the flesh; rinucerò to connect up to confuse love procreation, sexuality, monogamy, fidelity and cohabitation; refuse the option that mixes Jewish-Christian women, shame, guilt, guilt and atonement; criticize the collusion between monotheism, misogyny and order fallocratico; condemn the techniques of self-contempt and put in place ideologies Pythagoras, Plato and Christian bury the family, this primitive cell the politically and structurally it is based. In this way we can impeach comprendere.e then several centuries of Christianity-Judaism. "
And again
" My proposal, which fits in very ancient quarters and is fighting against the dominant ethical model, we would refer to the project without ambiguity all the Hellenistic schools of philosophy. Make possible the philosophical life and to this end, the end of life will openly mutilated, fragmented, exploded, dispersed, built by alienating our civilization, anchored in the values \u200b\u200bof money, the production of the work domain.
philosophy can make a fundamental contribution to this project.
Better yet, should.
First ceasing to be limited, as long ago, to raise questions, the history of the problems passively following the odyssey of questions, when they gain to set themselves clearly as the discipline of the solutions, answers and proposals.
For me, I'll settle for a philosophy that dedicates the substance of his time and energy to press its conditions of possibility, to examine the epistemological foundations on which to ask questions.
'd rather watch the other end of the chain of reflections, the sum of the statements and answers to lead a useful launched at full speed between the two nothing [...] I have always preferred a small discovery useful in terms of existential philosophy to research vast but useless for everyday life. "
taken from Animus et SOUL - The Spirit of things and the ' Soul of the world
http://www.animusetanima.com/dblog/articolo.asp?articolo=18
0 comments:
Post a Comment